Shapiro BLASTS Harris’s VP Vetting Lies

Person speaking at podium with raised finger.

A fierce political clash exposes the bitter fallout from Kamala Harris’s failed 2024 campaign and her attempt to rewrite history in her memoir.

Story Highlights

Josh Shapiro publicly calls Kamala Harris’s claims about their VP vetting process “blatant lies.”
Harris alleges Shapiro’s ambition and behavior made him unsuitable as her running mate.
Shapiro’s aggressive response signals his intent to remain a powerful player in 2028 politics.
The controversy reveals deep fractures within the Democratic Party, threatening future unity.

Shapiro’s Explosive Rebuttal to Harris’s Memoir

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro has launched a rare and fiery public attack against former Vice President Kamala Harris over her 2024 campaign memoir, “107 Days.” In a December 2025 interview with The Atlantic, Shapiro vehemently denied Harris’s account of his vice presidential vetting, labeling her descriptions as “complete and utter bullshit” and “blatant lies.” He expressed frustration that Harris only revealed her portrayal of him during the interview, accusing her of trying to “sell books” with a distorted narrative. This uncharacteristically blunt response stands in stark contrast to Shapiro’s normally polished political demeanor and underscores how seriously he views the damage to his reputation.

Details of the Disputed Vetting Process

Harris’s memoir recounts Shapiro’s vetting at the Naval Observatory, painting a picture of a candidate whose ambitions and questions raised concerns. She claims Shapiro asked about the number of bedrooms in the vice presidential residence and inquired about borrowing Pennsylvania artwork from the Smithsonian to decorate it. Harris also alleges Shapiro insisted on being involved in “every decision” she made as president, suggesting a reluctance to accept a subordinate role. Additionally, Harris notes that Shapiro used his Pennsylvania license plates during his visit, possibly tipping off reporters to his candidacy. Ultimately, Harris chose Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate, citing fears that Shapiro’s temperament could become a management problem.

Political Implications and Party Fractures

This public feud exposes the tensions simmering within the Democratic Party as it struggles to maintain unity after a disappointing 2024 election cycle. Shapiro’s aggressive defense signals his determination not to be sidelined, as he positions himself for a potential 2028 presidential run. His combative style, which includes orchestrating power-sharing deals and criticizing colleagues in Pennsylvania politics, may have justified Harris’s concerns but also appeals to voters tired of establishment politicking. Meanwhile, Harris’s memoir and the resulting controversy keep the party’s internal discord in the spotlight, risking further division as Democrats prepare for the 2026 midterms and the next presidential race.

Political analysts note that the vice presidency requires a delicate balance of loyalty and ambition. Harris’s decision reflects longstanding challenges in vetting running mates who view the position as a stepping stone rather than a team role. Shapiro’s public rebuttal, while potentially damaging to party cohesion, also reveals a party infrastructure grappling with strong-willed leaders and competing ambitions.

Looking Ahead: What This Means for Conservatives

For conservative Americans frustrated by leftist overreach, this Democratic infighting offers a clear example of the chaos bred by ambition unchecked by loyalty or respect for traditional roles. The episode underscores the consequences of a party embracing radical agendas and internal power struggles rather than focusing on governance. As President Trump leads the country with policies promoting limited government, fiscal responsibility, and strong borders, the Democrats’ internal conflicts highlight the contrast between conservative stability and progressive turmoil. Voters should remain vigilant as these political dramas unfold, which often mask deeper issues like government overreach and erosion of constitutional values.