When Obama’s CIA Director, John Brennan, was informed that he was under criminal investigation by the DOJ for his role in the Trump-Russia probe, his public meltdown was so over the top it could only come from a man convinced he’s above the law—and maybe above common sense.
At a Glance
- Former CIA Director John Brennan is under criminal investigation for his actions during the Trump-Russia probe.
- The DOJ is looking into possible false statements to Congress and procedural anomalies in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment.
- Brennan’s public reaction has been to claim total confusion and to denounce the investigation as authoritarian and politically motivated.
- The investigation follows years of controversy over the intelligence community’s conduct and the use of the discredited Steele dossier.
Criminal Investigation Targets Brennan’s Russia Probe Tactics
The Department of Justice has confirmed that John Brennan, who ran the CIA under Obama, is under criminal investigation by the FBI for his role in the infamous Trump-Russia probe. The inquiry centers on whether Brennan made false statements to Congress and engaged in procedural shenanigans during the creation of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, which accused Russia of intervening in the election to help Donald Trump. The investigation began after former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe referred evidence to the FBI, which was then led by Kash Patel. DOJ sources have described the probe as potentially involving a “conspiracy,” raising the stakes for everyone involved. Brennan is not alone: former FBI Director James Comey is also under the microscope for his leadership of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation and its reliance on the now-discredited Steele dossier. The stakes aren’t just political—they’re legal, and the outcome could send shockwaves through the highest levels of the intelligence community.
For years, Americans watched as the so-called “adults in the room” at the CIA and FBI spun a web of accusations, leaks, and dodgy intelligence to cast a shadow over the Trump presidency. Now, the tables have turned, and Brennan, one of the chief architects of the narrative, finds himself on the receiving end of a full-throttle federal investigation. The DOJ has refused to comment further, but the existence of the probe has been confirmed by multiple top-tier news outlets and corroborated with direct interviews, leaving no room for “conspiracy theory” claims from the usual suspects.
Brennan’s Response: ‘Clueless,’ Defiant, and Tone-Deaf
When news broke that he was under criminal investigation, Brennan’s reaction was straight out of a political satire—if only it weren’t real life. He told MSNBC he’s “clueless” about why he’s being targeted and doubled down on his defense of the intelligence community’s conduct during the Russia probe. In public statements and interviews, Brennan insists the investigation is nothing more than political payback, likening it to tactics out of an authoritarian regime’s playbook. This isn’t just tone-deaf, it’s the kind of gaslighting that’s become all too familiar from Washington’s self-anointed elites. As if the American public hasn’t seen enough evidence of government overreach, procedural “errors,” and outright falsehoods coming from the intelligence establishment these past few years.
Brennan’s defenders claim the investigation is politically motivated, but critics argue it’s about time someone in the intelligence community was held accountable for misleading Congress and the American people. When the same people who spent years pushing the “Russia collusion” narrative now act stunned that anyone would question their good faith, it’s almost comical—if you ignore the damage done to public trust and the Constitution. The DOJ and FBI might be tight-lipped, but the facts speak for themselves: the investigation into Brennan and Comey is real, and it’s about serious potential crimes, not political gamesmanship.
The Fallout: Accountability or More Excuses?
This case goes beyond one man’s ego or even just partisan politics. It’s about whether unelected bureaucrats can bend the rules, manipulate intelligence, and then play victim when they’re finally called to account. The investigation into Brennan and Comey’s conduct during the Trump-Russia probe is likely to have far-reaching consequences: for the intelligence community’s reputation, for the legal standards governing congressional testimony, and for the American public’s battered trust in its own institutions. Intelligence professionals have tried to defend the 2017 assessment, saying they faced extraordinary pressures in real time. But critics point to procedural anomalies, the use of unverified opposition research, and a pattern of misleading statements as evidence of a deeper rot in the system.
Whatever the outcome, this criminal probe is a reminder of why checks and balances—and public scrutiny—matter. If the DOJ follows through, we may finally see a reckoning for those who abused their authority in pursuit of political vendettas. If not, it will only confirm what millions of Americans already suspect: when it comes to the intelligence community, the rules are for little people, not the self-styled kings and queens of Washington.
