FBI faces explosive accusations of a nine-year coverup in Seth Rich murder, defying court orders and burying evidence that could shatter the Russia hoax narrative.
Story Snapshot
- Attorney Ty Clevenger charges FBI with lying to federal courts and hiding massive records on Seth Rich’s death.
- FBI allegedly knew since 2016 that Rich, not Russian hackers, leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks.
- Bureau defies current court order to produce documents, with contempt motion pending.
- Republican lawmakers like Massie, Loudermilk, and Jordan criticized for ignoring the case amid other probes.
FBI Accused of Nine-Year Coverup
Attorney Ty Clevenger directly accuses the FBI of orchestrating a nine-year coverup surrounding Seth Rich’s 2016 murder. He claims the bureau repeatedly lied to federal courts about evidence. Clevenger asserts the FBI hid records on a massive scale, shielding details of Rich’s death from public scrutiny. This defiance undermines trust in federal institutions, a core concern for conservatives valuing transparency and accountability in government.
Evidence Points to Seth Rich as DNC Leak Source
Clevenger reveals the FBI may have known since 2016 that Seth Rich supplied DNC emails to WikiLeaks, contradicting the official Russia hacker narrative. Rich, a DNC staffer murdered in Washington D.C., becomes central to claims of suppressed truth. This revelation challenges the foundation of past investigations pushed by Democrats, highlighting potential deep state interference in elections. Conservatives see this as eroding faith in electoral integrity.
The FBI’s alleged withholding of documents continues today, ignoring a direct court order to release materials. Clevenger notes this ongoing obstruction blocks full disclosure. Such actions by the bureau fuel frustrations over government overreach and secrecy, echoing broader conservative critiques of federal agencies abusing power against American citizens.
Republican Lawmakers Called Out for Silence
Clevenger blasts Republican representatives including Thomas Massie, Barry Loudermilk, and Jim Jordan for their silence on the Seth Rich case. These lawmakers pursued other high-profile investigations yet overlooked this matter. He questions their commitment to uncovering deep state abuses, urging action to hold the FBI accountable. This critique resonates with Trump supporters demanding Congress prioritize constitutional oversight.
A pending motion seeks to hold the FBI in contempt of court for non-compliance. Clevenger hints at forthcoming grand conspiracy indictments from Florida, signaling potential legal reckoning. Under President Trump’s leadership in 2025, renewed scrutiny on past FBI misconduct aligns with efforts to drain the swamp and restore justice.
Implications for Justice and Trust
The Seth Rich saga exposes risks to investigative integrity when federal agencies stonewall courts. Conservatives view this as a direct threat to truth-seeking, paralleling frustrations with past hoaxes like Russiagate. President Trump’s administration offers hope for reforms targeting bureaucratic overreach. Full disclosure remains essential to rebuild public confidence in institutions serving the people.
