Will RFK Jr. Face Legal Consequences for Leaving Dead Bear in Park?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Independent presidential candidate, recently admitted to leaving a dead bear cub in New York’s Central Park back in 2014. This revelation has sparked discussions about potential legal consequences for such an action. Kennedy disclosed that he was driving when someone else struck and killed the bear. He initially planned to use its meat but didn’t have time to store it. So, he admitted, he decided to discard the body at Central Park making it appear that the bear was hit by someone on a bicycle.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation investigated the incident at the time and concluded that the bear died from blunt-force trauma consistent with a high-speed collision. Kennedy’s recent admission has brought this decade-old incident back into the spotlight, raising questions about possible legal repercussions.

Legal Implications and Statute of Limitations

Despite the unusual nature of the incident, it appears that Kennedy will not face legal consequences for his actions. The primary reason for this is the statute of limitations on related offenses.

“The statute of limitations for these offenses is one year; charges cannot be brought for incidents that occurred more than one year ago,” the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation clarified.

Had Kennedy admitted to the act at the time, he could have faced fines up to $250 for illegal possession and disposal of a bear. However, the one-year statute of limitations has long since expired, making prosecution impossible.

Public Reaction and Political Implications

The revelation has stirred public interest and drawn varying reactions. Some view it as a minor incident, while others see it as indicative of Kennedy’s judgment and character.

“It’s barely illegal,” said Ron Kuby, veteran New York criminal defense lawyer, stating that Kennedy would not have been subject to criminal charges even if he faced fines from the city.

Despite the lack of legal consequences, the incident has become a topic of discussion in Kennedy’s presidential campaign. His independent run has already faced challenges in gaining ballot access, and this unusual story adds another layer of complexity to his public image.

Financial Demands and Campaign Impact

While legal prosecution is off the table, there have been calls for Kennedy to face financial consequences for his actions. New York City Comptroller Brad Lander has demanded that Kennedy pay nearly $24,000, including accrued interest, for the incident.

“Bear with me for a moment — I did the math, and on behalf of all New Yorkers, I demand that @RobertKennedyJr promptly send the City of New York what he owes for his ursine exploits,” Brad Lander, New York City Comptroller, said on X.

As Kennedy continues his presidential campaign, this incident serves as an unusual footnote in his political journey. While he may not face legal consequences, the story’s resurgence could impact public perception and potentially influence his campaign’s trajectory.