The DOJ’s recent “Strike Force” announcement raises questions about whether it’s a genuine investigation or simply political theater.
Story Highlights
- The “Strike Force” aims to review evidence but avoids labeling it a full investigation.
- No credible evidence supports claims of probing Obama-Biden as a criminal conspiracy.
- Trump’s pressure on DOJ fuels debates on political motivations.
- Over 100 DOJ resignations highlight internal resistance to alleged interference.
DOJ’s “Strike Force”: Investigative Clarity or Political Theater?
The Department of Justice’s announcement of a “Strike Force” to review evidence publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has sparked controversy. Critics argue it lacks substance, focusing on document review rather than a comprehensive investigation targeting Obama or Biden. Conservative circles initially hailed it as vindication against perceived “deep state” actions, but mainstream legal analyses describe it as political theater.
No credible evidence supports assertions of a probe into Obama-era “Russiagate” abuses as a criminal conspiracy. Instead, the official statement limits the scope to reviewing potential legal steps from Gabbard’s disclosures, not criminal charges.
Background of Republican Allegations
Republican frustration stems from long-standing allegations of Obama-Biden administration’s “weaponization” of Russiagate probes. Previous investigations, like those by John Durham, found no wrongdoing by Obama officials. Amid Trump’s vows for retaliation post-2024 election, these claims have resurfaced. The DOJ’s current moves, including rescinding Biden-era press protections, signal significant shifts in approach.
Current Developments and Reactions
As of late 2025, no prosecutions have emerged from the “Strike Force.” President Trump has publicly expressed frustration over the perceived inaction, while the DOJ maintains that it is assessing “potential next legal steps.” This preliminary review phase has seen numerous resignations within the DOJ, as over 100 lawyers have left, citing political interference.
The resignations have disrupted operations, eroding the DOJ’s credibility. The new guidelines allow for more aggressive actions against leaks, raising concerns over press freedom and targeting journalists.
Bondi asks prosecutors to probe Obama-Biden lawfare as criminal conspiracy
“Such an approach allows prosecutors to charge defendants with alleged crimes outside the statute of limitations…much like those cases brought against the mafia and drug cartels”https://t.co/YExqYXZbX8
— Gates McGavick (@GatesMcgavick) December 29, 2025
Sources:
The Situation: Pam Bondi Announces a Ghost Investigation
DOJ Rescinds News Media Guidelines Analysis
US Presidency Weaponised Department of Justice Investigations Prompt Concerns Over Independence
Does a Politically Directed Department of Justice Merit the Presumption of Regularity?
